By Samantha Cole of Tanzania Business Ethics

Another strongly worded and direct message on Thursday, October 6, 2016 from President Dr JP Magufuli at a public inauguration ceremony of a new fruit processing factory in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

In his public statement, the President said:  “I like businesses that pay tax and hate those which don’t. I like businesspeople who create jobs for Tanzanians….  We seriously need the businesspeople of your kind and my government will cooperate with you. You created employment, paid taxes and anyone who is against you is a devil….” said the President.

In July 2016, the FT reported online that President Magufuli questioned the deals struck with foreign miners, and actually singled out London-listed Acacia Mining, formerly African Barrick Gold, arguing that companies have been allowed to declare years of losses while paying dividends overseas.  Only a few months earlier, on March 31, 2016, a Revenue Authority Tribunal found Barrick Gold guilty of a sophisticated scheme of tax evasion.  In fact, Barrick appealed that guilty verdict and last week, the Court of Appeal gave their Judgment – and again (not surprising), Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining find themselves facing the Court’s decision of GUILTY, again, of tax evasion.

In parallel to the above tax evasion judgments and the President publicly voicing his “hate” for companies who don’t pay tax, there is also the Barrick Gold public corruption and fraud scandal that was exposed by Bloomberg media in July 2015.

How does one understand this astonishing, zero-accountability strategy of Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining?

Jonathan Drimmer is Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at Barrick Gold.  His online profiles states that Mr. Drimmer’s has multiple responsibilities, such as:
>  to oversee the company’s anti-corruption and business and human rights programs; 
>  overseeing entity level disputes, including litigation, international arbitrations, and mediations;
>  helping oversee international regulatory and compliance programs, focusing particularly on anti-corruption and human rights,
>  overseeing internal and external investigations, including global corporate investigations group, encompassing a variety of issues from around the world;
>  involvement in contract negotiations, corporate governance, securities disclosure matters, legislative efforts, employment and labor issues, and M&A due diligence.

We must publically ask Mr. Drimmer:
Since you joined Barrick Gold some 6 years ago, long before Acacia Mining was even born, where were you when you had to fulfill these responsibilities here in Tanzania? 
The answer runs much deeper and therein, we must present here more research.

Let us understand the roots and beginnings of Barrick Gold and Peter Munk. 
Google research tells us that Barrick Gold was the idea of Peter Munk, a former radio manufacturer.  Mr. Munk made headlines in Canada when he sold his shares in the company shortly before it was declared insolvent.  Talk about a “golden parachute” paid for by investors and the Canadian taxpayer?
Mr. Munk’s name was instantly mud in the investment community, but fortunately for him, no indictment was ever brought against him.  Surprised?

Enter into the picture, the Saudi Arabian notorious arms dealer, Mr. Adnan Khashoggi.  There is no shortage of scandals – illegal, financial, sexual, ethical and others, surrounding this Saudi man.
>  Mr. Khashoggi was held for illegal dealings involving millions of dollars allegedly stolen from the Philippines government by former President Ferdinand Marcos and his wife, Imelda.
>  He negotiated the arms sales to Iran in the Iran-Contra affair
>  He was arrested for money laundering of US$ 300 million, using an Indian citizen, through the Zurich branch of Swiss bank, UBS.  The case goes back to 1982.
>  The UK Daily Mail revealed in April 1989, that Khashoggi was the man behind Pamella Bordes, the girl involved House of Commons sex scandal, who obtained a job there, was given security clearance as a researcher while working as a call girl.  Much of her activity was masterminded from abroad.  She was used as a sexual bribe to facilitate international dealings by Khashoggi.
>  He was eventually brought to justice by the ever-vigilant SEC in the USA.
(As a matter of interest, Khashoggi’s sister, Samira, was the mother of Dodi Fayed, who was killed with Princess Diana in Paris, in 1997.)

Peter Munk chose Mr. Khashoggi as a partner to finance the start of Barrick Gold. Clearly, Mr. Munk had no ethical or other considerations of integrity in choosing such a partner to finance his business plans.   Khashoggi and Munk kicked off their partnership with a series of hotel investments.   In 1983, the Saudi arms dealer came up with the cash to purchase Barrick. Peter Munk was installed as chairman.

Mr. Khashoggi distanced himself from Barrick shortly after the Iran-Contra scandal was exposed in the mid-1980’s.   The scandal involved the secret sale of USA weapons to Iran (which was supposed to help in the release of U.S. hostages in the Middle East).  Some of the proceeds from these sales were used to covertly fund the Contra war in Nicaragua.

Even though Mr. Khashoggi  removed himself from the Barrick Gold picture,  he still held onto his stock, tied up as collateral for Oliver North’s arms transfers to Iran in 1985).    His Triad Holding Company went bankrupt after he was indicted for using it to channel money for the Iran-Contra deal.   Fortunately,  Mr. Khashoggi made his $4 million bail thanks to his friend, Peter Munk,  the Chairman of Barrick Gold.  Barrick Gold, which was founded by Khashoggi in the first place, is also deep into illegal government activity. 

Adnan Khashoggi is connected to numerous shocking events that occurred since 1960, usually by no more than one or two degrees.   A partial list would include Iran-Contra, Wedtech,  BCCI,  the Marcos Philippine kleptocracy,  the Synfuels fiasco, and the discovery of buried mustard gas in the pricy Spring Valley neighborhood of Washington, D.C.
To these we must add the tragic events of Sept. 11 and a connection to Osama Bin Laden!!

There is so much more – one could write a best seller book, all based on fact!  But let us get back to the ethics and integrity of Peter Munk and Barrick Gold.
In 1995, Mr. Munk’s took steps to restore his reputation, at least in his own mind, in part by massive donations to the University of Toronto. 
Following this act of philanthropy, the university awarded Mr. Munk an honorary degree.  Several students were arrested protesting what appeared to them as a cash-for-honors deal.
Thus began Peter Munk’s “pay cash to buy honors” career.

We already researched and reported on Barrick Chairman, John Thornton – see the online article: The Height of Hypocrisy – Does It Get Any Worse Than This? Barrick Gold Chairman Lays It On Thick.
In addition, we reported online on the Fraud and Corruption sponsored by Mr. Kelvin Dushnisky – President of Barrick Gold & Chairman of Acacia Mining.

Furthermore, we reported online on the CEO of Acacia Mining, Mr. Brad Gordon and we listed some of the situations that Mr. Gordon was part of which paints a very clear picture of the integrity and morals (or lack thereof) in his responsibilities and functions as CEO of the companies in which he has worked over the past 10 years.

It is definitely an eye opener, and very distressing how the Acacia Mining “TRIO” of Brad Gordon, Peter Spora and Deo Mwanyika work together against Tanzania and the People of our country.
And now, we see that Jonathan Drimmer, Barrick Gold Vice President, based out of Washington in the USA, follows closely in the footsteps of his bosses at Barrick.

Here is a man who, according to online profiles, is :
>  teaches business and human rights law at Georgetown University Law Center.
>  on the Board of Directors of Trace International, a non-profit dedicated to anti-corruption compliance
>  on the American Conference Institute’s Global Advisory Board for anti-corruption
>  representative of Barrick on UN Global Compact steering committees and working groups for human rights, security, and supply chains.
>  recognized by Ethisphere Magazine as a leading attorney in Ethics & Compliance
>  named by The Law 500 as one of the 100 most influential in-house counsels.
And the list goes on and on…

So we ask Mr. Drimmer:
How does he feel working in a company that was built on dirty money – certainly unethical money?
How does Mr. Drimmer justify working in a company that has roots and funding from a man who is linked to 9/11 and Osama Bin laden? 
How does Mr. Drimmer feel knowing that his anti-corruption responsibilities are twisted and concocted by Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining officials in different countries around the world?

Even worse, Mr. Drimmer dares to state openly on public record:  “Together with my colleagues, I plan to continue developing Barrick’s human rights program to ensure the company fulfills its commitment to respect and elevate human rights wherever it operates. These are ideals that I am passionate about and that continue to be the focus of my career.

Does this law lecturer, this Professor at law understand how false and dishonest it is to declare such words in public when he knows all too well how terrible, shocking and soul-destroying his company operates in the sphere of human-rights and anti-corruption?  We will still address the other elements below…..  The worst is still to come…..

Google research points to an investigative journalist, Greg Palast, who wrote articles and a book called “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy”. 
In November 2000, Mr. Palast wrote an article in the The London Observer, called: Bush family finances: Best democracy money can buy.
Here are some excerpts from his investigation article and associated websites:
>  During George W. Bush’s presidency, Khashoggi was identified as conduit in the Iran-Contra conspiracy.   As his last act in office, the president pardoned Khashoggi’s alleged co-conspirators, key members of Bush’s own cabinet – the co-conspirators who helped Khashoggi arm the “Axis of Evil” (in 2002, Bush’s son who was President then, referred to Iraq, Iran and North Korea as the “Axis of Evil”).  This pardon made charges against the sheik (Khashoggi ) all but impossible. (Bush pardoned the conspirators not as a favor to Khashoggi, but to himself.)
>   In 1992, in the final hours of the Bush presidency, Barrick took control of US government-owned property containing an estimated $10bn in gold.  For the whole shooting match, Barrick paid the US Treasury only $10,000.  According to experts at the Mineral Policy Center of Washington, DC, Barrick saved—and the U.S. taxpayer lost—a cool billion or so. Upon taking office, Bill Clinton’s new interior secretary, Bruce Babbitt, called Barrick’s claim the “biggest gold heist since the days of Butch Cassidy.”
>   In 1992, Clinton’s newly elected administration was ready to prevent Barrick’s stunning grab. But Barrick is a lucky outfit. Bush’s Interior Department expedited procedures to ram through Barrick’s claim stake before Clinton’s inauguration.  Clinton had no choice but to give them the gold mine while the public got the shaft.
>   Ex-Pres George Bush was lucky, too. When the electorate booted him from the White House, he landed softly – on the Barrick Goldstrike payroll, where he comfortably nested until last year (1999).
>   In 1995, Barrick hired the former president as Honorary Senior Advisor to the Toronto company’s International Advisory Board. Bush joined at the suggestion of former Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney, who, like Bush, had been ignominiously booted from office. I was a bit surprised that the president had signed on. When Bush was voted out of the White House, he vowed never to lobby or join a corporate board. The chairman of Barrick openly boasts that granting the title “Senior Advisor” was a sly maneuver to help Bush tiptoe around this promise.
>   In September 1996, Bush wrote a letter to help convince Indonesian dictator Suharto to give Barrick a new, hot gold-mining concession.  Bush’s letter seemed to do the trick. Suharto took away 68 percent of the world’s largest goldfield from the finder of the ore and handed it to Barrick.
>   Mobutu Sese Seko, the late dictator of the Congo (Zaire), was one of the undisputed master criminals of the last century having looted hundreds of millions of dollars from his national treasury— and a golfing buddy of the senior Bush. That old link from the links probably did not hurt Barrick in successfully seeking an eighty-thousand-acre gold-mining concession from the Congolese cutthroat.
Rebellion against Mobutu made the mine site unusable, though not for the company’s lack of trying. In testimony in hearings convened by the minority leader of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Human Rights, expert Wayne Madsen alleged that Barrick, to curry favor with both sides, indirectly funded both and thereby inadvertently helped continue the bloody conflict.
>   In 1997, Mother Jones (American magazine reporting on politics, the environment, human rights, and culture) named Barrick’s chairman Munk one of America’s “10 Little Piggies”—quite an honor for a Canadian—for allegedly poisoning the West’s water supply with the tons of cyanide Barrick uses to melt mountains of ore.
There is so much more but we must move on…

So we repeat our questions to Prof. Jonathan Drimmer, Vice President of Barrick Gold and in-house specialist for human rights, compliance, ethics, etc and of course, the specialist against corruption etc:
Are you satisfied to be employed by those Barrick people? 
Is this company and the foundations upon which it was built and stands today, acceptable to you and in conformity with your integrity and morals?
Can you honestly teach and lecture to your students how you, their Professor, can work for a company as described above… or even if the above is partly accurate…  can you teach students about “partly ethics” or “partly integrity”?

In the June 2016 Canadian General Counsel Awards (CGCA), Barrick Gold was awarded the “Social Responsibility Award“.  Prof. Drimmer and Mr. Rich Haddock received the award on behalf of Barrick Gold.

It’s amazing that Prof. Drimmer was quoted, at the award celebrations, saying publically:  “I came to Barrick because of the company’s commitment to enhance its existing program”.

The only “program” that we see from your global operations is violence, rape, murder, destruction of villages and property around your mines, environmental devastation, poisoned water, and more….

Are you so impressed with the “existing program” that you can condone the firing of senior engineer Raman Autar in 2014 because Barrick Gold needed to “escape publication” of critical health, safety and environmental violations he found at the Veladero mine, one of the world’s largest gold mines.
Raman raised serious safety concerns about the mining operation responsible for the contamination – linked to a valve failure and open sluice gate — and Barrick Gold dumped more than one million litres of the cyanide solution into five rivers in Argentina’s San Juan province.

Prof. Drimmer…. Will you stand up in front of your law students and lecture to them that the above conforms to your standards of “human rights” ?
Or perhaps it agrees with your ethics and compliance standards? 
Or perhaps you would stand up at one of your many law conferences and give a speech how you condone this disgusting and unfair treatment of Raman Autar?

Like your Chairman, and President and CEO and others ..… Prof. Drimmer, your standards are a farce, a mockery to human rights, an embarrassment to ethics, a disgrace to anti-corruption and a sham to compliance and integrity.
You, Sir, have no right to lecture or teach to the professionals of tomorrow.
God help us if they go out into the world with your teachings as their basis!

There are media reports that your company is closing down Buzwagi Gold Mine in Tanzania in December 2017 as production has fallen.  If this happens, we will be truly saddened for more than 1,300 people will lose jobs and Kahama District Council will miss Sh1.7 billion it has been getting every year as a service levy.

On the flipside of the coin, we are inspired by our President’s attitude as regards overseas mining companies who do not pay their taxes in Tanzania.  Only a few months ago at the celebrations marking the 50th anniversary of the establishment of the Bank of Tanzania (BoT), our President publically stated that apart from proper collection of government revenue, the President instructed the Treasury to put measures in place that would ensure that the revenue assurance system was working. Our President also asked senior officials to ensure that they supervise tax collection in mining companies as well as ensuring that they seal loop holes for tax evasion.

The President said, “There have been instances where a mining company operates in the country for 10 years but still its officials are telling you that they don’t make any profit … if that is the case, they better go back to their countries

Furthermore, he sent this clear message to mining companies:
“It is better for us Tanzanian’s to remain with our precious gems under our grounds for even 1,000 years than to let overseas mining companies take our precious gems and NOT pay taxes and fairly and honestly.  It is not a sin to leave our precious gem mining pits for the next generations to work on and benefit from fair and correct taxes and royalties.”

The President’s focus on Barrick Gold and it’s daughter company, Acacia Mining, in which Barrick owns and controls 63.9%) is no shock to the global mining sector.

Tanzanians still talk about the 1997 massacre at Bulyanhulu mine in the Shinyanga district.  We all mourn the 50+ artisanal gold miners whom, our villagers witnessed, were bulldozed and buried (maybe alive).
If only President Magufuli would have been in office on that terrible day in 1997, certainly one of the blackest days in the history of Tanzanian human rights.  And the accountability, Prof. Drimmer?  Perhaps this massacre would be a good subject matter for one of your semesters?  

Prof. Drimmer, next month, on November 2, you will be a key note speaker at the 2016 annual BSR conference.

If only we could arrange to have you on live TV or Skype online for all Tanzanians to hear your speech.
You have the opportunity to make things right but history repeats itself and your non-accountable bosses will fire you on the spot if you try introduce change to Barrick Gold – just as they did to the senior engineer, Raman Autar.
The decision is.. do I take the money and be quiet or do I stand up tall (like Raman Autar) and sleep peacefully at night?

Your online profile states that you are “passionate” about your ideals of anti-corruption, human rights, ethics and compliance.  There are tens of millions of people around the world who are influenced, in one way or another, by Barrick Gold.  Does Prof. Drimmer have the wherewithal to be THE ONE who can deliver on his ideals to make the world a better place?

Finally, we remind our readers of Prof. Drimmer’s online interview with Nick Elliot from the Wall Street Journal.
One of Nick’s many questions to Prof. Drimmer, was:

There has been keen competition for mining assets around the world, sometimes involving unscrupulous companies that will pay bribes. How do you deal with that and what do you do if you think you lost out on a project because of corruption?

Prof. Drimmer replied:
Barrick strives to operate according to the highest ethical standards, wherever we do business.  We support enforcement of anti-corruption laws to ensure there is a level playing field, and hope that Western governments will increase their efforts on the “demand” side of bribery, working with foreign governments and foreign government officials.

In fact, Prof. Drimmer, Barrick Gold was built on the exact opposite of what you answered.
We already established that Chairman John Thornton and President Kelvin Dushnisky and CEO Brad Gordon could not care less about anything other than making more Dollars.  Barrick has failed over and over around the world to follow the ideals in your above answer to Nick. 
In Tanzania, Barrick Gold has been lambasted publically in Parliament and exposed in the media for corruption, fraud, human rights offenses, dishonest dealings with local companies, and so much more.

Tanzanians are waiting to see if Professor Jonathan Drimmer can rise up tall and deliver on his ideals – for Tanzania in particular and the rest of the world, in general.
Copies to:
President Dr. J.P. Magufuli
Tanzania Government officials
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Canadian Government officials
Prime Minister Theresa may
British Government officials
Barrick Gold Directors & Management
Acacia Mining Directors & Management
Journalists & Social Media worldwide
BSR Conference and all 2016 speakers
U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations
Office of the U.S. Solicitor General
Georgetown University Law Center.
Trace International
American Conference Institute’s Global Advisory Board for anti-corruption
UN Global Compact Network
Ethisphere Magazine
The Law Firm 500


TANZANIA : Barrick Gold / Acacia Mining lose appeal to overturn March 2016 guilty verdict of tax evasion

By Samantha Cole by Tanzania Business Ethics

Public letter to the President of BARRICK GOLD, Kelvin Dushnisky and the CEO of ACACIA MINING, Bradley Gordon

Dear Mr. Dushnisky and Mr. Gordon

The law certainly entitles every guilty defendant to appeal their guilty verdict. In your case, Barrick Gold / Acacia Mining were found guilty AGAIN of tax evasion, on 31 March 2016.

To remind you, last year, you started your appeal to overturn the Judgment of the Tax Revenue Appeals Board in Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2011 (Fikirini, VC) dated 15th May 2011.
On 31 March 2016, the TAX REVENUE APPEALS TRIBUNAL in Dar es Salaam returned their 23 page Judgment in the matter of your Appeal.  As is public knowledge, your Appeal was thrown out and Barrick had to pay full costs.

Please allow us to quote directly, 3 paragraphs from pages 20 and 21 of the Judgment:

The conclusion that can be drawn from the above definitions is that the explanation offered by ABG (African Barrick Gold) as the source of dividends, i.e., distributable reserves and IPO proceeds is far from being plausible. In the circumstances, it is fair to conclude that the respondent’s argument that the transactions were simply a design created by the appellant aimed at tax evasion was justified. One also wonders as to how could part of IPO proceeds, a one-off event, even if those proceeds were distributable as dividends (which in law they are not), could explain the payment of four-years, back-to-back dividends to the appellant’s shareholders.

Since ABG’s only entities that carry on business anywhere in the world are the three Tanzanian gold-mining companies, ABG’s only source of revenue that could create net profits or retained earnings would be the three Tanzanian companies (or one or more of them). While none of them was allegedly making any profits, and since the appellant has no other subsidiary anywhere in the world engaged in business, one is compelled to further conclude that at least one, if not more or all, of the appellant’s three gold producing subsidiaries in Tanzania was making profit. We see no other plausible explanation.

Ultimately, the fact that none of ABG’s subsidiaries is declaring any profit that could provide its holding company with such huge net profits sufficient to distribute to its shareholders four years in a row is what in our respectful opinion constitutes the evidence of a sophisticated scheme of tax evasion…..

So…. the Tribunal established, beyond any doubt, that Barrick Gold had a clear and present agenda to cheat their host country, Tanzania, from paying taxes.

Nevertheless, the law is the law and your lawyers, undoubtedly making BIG BUCKS in fees and consultations, were only too delighted to receive your instructions to start an Appeal process to overturn the March 31 Judgment.

And this week, the three Judges in the Court of Appeal gave their Judgment – and again (not surprising), Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining find themselves facing the decision of GUILTY, again of tax evasion.
The three Judges, Justice Salum Massati, Justice Stella Mugasha and Justice Edward Rutakangwa made their ruling very clear and fully agreed with the Commissioner General, Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) and the Judgment brought by the Tribunal on March 31, 2016.

We, in Tanzania, have sadly grown accustomed to the terrible treatment that Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining dish out to our communities around the Barrick mines, the murders, the rapes, the violence, the destruction of properties, the death of the cattle and poisoning of the rivers and dams leading to massive environment devastation…. (we do give credit for the school desks, the roads you build and other benefits but those are lost in the dark shadow of your devastation)…..  And very sadly, the list goes on, almost a copy of what happens in other countries worldwide where Barrick operate their gold mines.
Clearly, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree and Acacia Mining, Barrick Gold’s daughter company, has learnt the same modus operandii from “mother company”.

As much as this US$ 42 million verdict against Barrick Gold / Acacia Mining is nothing more than a drop in the ocean for them, and they wont even blink an eye at paying the TRA, possibly the most amazing or unbelievable act coming out of this whole sad fiasco is Acacia Mining’s public press release on their website, dated October 5, 2016.
In spite of the three Justices ruling against Barrick and in favour of the TRA, Acacia actually have the audacity to write:

“……. At this stage, the Court of Appeal has made no findings with respect to the claim for withholding tax or alleged tax evasion, and rather dismissed Acacia’s initial appeal on procedural matters. Acacia will be lodging a corrected appeal against the claim which will be heard at the Court of Appeal in due course.

Any further comment is inappropriate at this stage, other than to state that Acacia has and will continue to comply with all its lawful obligations to pay domestic and international taxes and has not undertaken tax evasion of any form.

Yes, we are Africans and yes, Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining still operate here in Tanzania as if these are still days of colonialism but, Mr. Dushnisky and Mr. Gordon, how in the world do you expect to try fool everyone into believing your absolute misleading and blatantly inaccurate press release above?
Indeed, the people of Tanzania speak more Swahili than English but we ALL understand enough English to know the truth. So, clearly you are deliberately misleading your overseas investors and shareholders…. God help them under your cruel swords!

How can you possibly meet with our country’s officials and look them in the eye when you are so dishonest and unethical in your business dealings?

Mr. Dushnisky, for almost a year we have been writing you public letters to urge you to come here to Tanzania and clean up the mess that Mr. Gordon is making here, at ground level.  Maybe you see him as a wonder-boy in your London or Toronto Boardroom.  But here, in Tanzania, Acacia Mining is a nightmare.

Later we will address the new announcement about closing one of your mines here next year.


Samantha Cole

Tanzanians reach out & appeal to The Canadian Institute of Mining

By Samantha Cole of Tanzanian Business Ethics


Copies to:
Board members & Management of Barrick & Acacia;
Tanzania President Dr, JP Magufuli;
Tanzania Chief Secretary, Amb. JWH Kijazi;
Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau
Tanzania Minister Sospeter Muhongo;
Other Tanzanian Ministers;
Other Canadian Ministers
Journalists worldwide.

Dear Mr. Jean Vavrek, Executive Director

We are a Tanzanian voluntary group working and dedicated to the new policies of our President Magufuli against fraud and corruption in Tanzania.

Your website of the Canadian Institute of Mining is   www.cim.org .  It states that your Institute was established almost 120 years ago!!

It is interesting and encouraging that the MISSION statement in your website states:
To champion the world’s best practices and expertise for integrated resource development at home and globally.

In your published Annual Report in your website, your recent President, Mr. Robert Schafer, wrote as follows:
During my tenure as President of CIM, numerous worldwide sources expressed their desire to emulate this country, looking to Canada as a role model for their economies, our respect for diversity and the transparent and ethical business environment.  We have a brand here – the “Canadian Brand” – that can be exported, advanced and leveraged around the globe”.

We are reaching out and appealing to you, Mr. Vavrek, to take action AGAINST Canadian mining companies who are NOT operating according to the words above.   You know all too well that Barrick Gold owns controlling interest in Acacia Mining, otherwise known as African Barrick Gold.  Together, they operate three gold mines in our country, Tanzania.

You know all too well that Barrick Gold have been exposed recently in Tanzania for FRAUD and also their involvement in CORRUPTION with at least one or maybe more senior official(s) in the Ministry of Mines here.  Under separate email, we sent you all the documentary proof.  It is public knowledge that the Corruption Police (PCCB) in Tanzania are investigating this fraud and corruption.  It is public knowledge that the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) in the UK and the RCMP Fraud & Corruption Unit in Ottawa are also investigating these fraud and corruption charges.

You know all too well that Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining were find GUILTY earlier this year for TAX EVASION in Tanzania.

You know all too well that Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining are defending a US$ 115 million legal claim from a local mining company, Bismark Hotel (Mining) Ltd for negligence in losing mining land concessions and later fraud activities to try get themselves free from the Bismark claim.

You know all too well about the public reports of Barrick Gold’s direct involvement in MURDER, RAPE, VIOLENCE, PRIVATE PROPERTY DESTRUCTION, ENVIRONMENT DEVASTATION and the list goes on….

Only last week, in your own Toronto newspaper, the Globe and Mail, there was a detailed article:  POLICE KILLED 65, INJURED 270 at BARRICK MINE IN TANZANIA, INQUIRY HEARS

Surely, Mr. Vavrek, the above atrocities do NOT fit into your MISSION statement of “the world’s best practices” ?
Surely, Mr. Vavrek, the above killings, human rights crimes, environment carnage and more, do NOT fit into your President’s statement of “…our respect for diversity and the transparent and ethical business environment”.
Surely this is NOT what your President so proudly wrote about “…..We have a brand here – the “Canadian Brand” – that can be exported…”.

We, the simple Tanzanian people, living tens of thousands of kilometers from your Canada offices, living under the dark clouds of Barrick Gold and its daughter company, Acacia Mining – we appeal to you, we reach out to you, we petition you and if you so need, we beg you to take steps against Barrick Gold for their despicable activities and operations in our country.

Indeed, there are many other countries that are suffering under Barrick Gold’s tyranny and control but we are not there – we are here and we can only talk about what we see, what we experience, what we live….. through our eyes and through the eyes of our Tanzanian sisters and brothers.

People tell us we are fools to think that your Canadian Mining Institute can take steps against Barrick Gold when Barrick probably controls your Institute as well.

Well, then we appeal to Prime Minister Trudeau and his Ministers – all of whom will receive a copy of this letter – to take steps.
Furthermore, we appeal to our President, Dr. Magufuli, to use the relevant channels to request that Prime Minister Trudeau will take this seriously.

We need the mining companies here.  Our people can benefit greatly – but NOT under these terrible circumstances.

We look forward to your speed reply and good news that you will take action and start taking steps regarding the disgusting and certainly ILLEGAL activities of Barrick Gold in Tanzania (and around the world).

Samantha Cole


By Samantha Cole of Tanzania Business Ethics



Mr. Kelvin Dushnisky and Mr. Brad Gordon.

Copies to:
Board members of Barrick & Acacia;
President Dr, JP Magufuli;
Chief Secretary, Amb. JWH Kijazi;
Minister Sospeter Muhongo;
Other Tanzania Ministers;
Journalists worldwide.

Dear Mr. Kelvin Dushnisky and Mr. Brad Gordon

Only days ago, we shared with the public, a report from Geoffrey York (Globe and Mail in Toronto).  The heading of the report was POLICE KILLED 65, INJURED 270 AT BARRICK MINE IN TANZANIA.

 A Tanzanian Government inquiry heard official complaints and evidence by our local Tanzania community representatives that police have killed 65 people and injured 270 during years of sporadic clashes with villagers at Barrick Gold – Acacia Mining owned North Mara gold mine.

These details of the fatalities, injuries, human rights crimes and more and  is the first official estimate of the scale of reported violence at Barrick Gold’s North Mara gold mine, operated by Barrick’s daugher company,  Acacia Mining – otherwise known as African Barrick Gold.

The timing of this report from the Tanzanian Government inquiry might well have come at a very difficult time for the Acacia Mining management since within a matter of less than a week at the beginning of last month (September),  the number one man at North Mara mine, Mr. Gary Chapman, left the company and took a position with another mining company in Ghana.  Even more mysterious was the sudden disappearance of the number one Legal Counsel, Ms. Katrina White, who was based at Acacia Mining in London but was very well known as a regular visitor in Dar es Salaam and also a Director of the North Mara mine.

Acacia Mining made a weak attempt to respond to the Globe and Mail report in the Acacia website.  In fact, Acacia’s response gives rise to more questions than it gives answers regarding the human rights violations at the North Mara mine in Tanzania.

Barrick Gold also published a response in the Barrick website to the same Globe and Mail report that “Police killed 65, injured 270 at Barrick mine in Tanzania“.

MiningWatch in Canada and RAID in the UK, together, point out that the Barrick Gold wrote in their response that they confirm and are aware of the violence at their Tanzanian North Mara mine – Barrick wrote:  ‘there have been confrontations with police resulting in deaths’.   We question Barrick’s “oh well” attitude and challenge them to take a more active and committed role since they are the majority and controlling shareholder in this Acacia Mining gold mine.

More hurtful and damaging is that Acacia Mining’s attitude appears to write-off these terrible human right’s crimes at the North Mara mine to history – another “oh well, what’s past is past”.

In fact, both Barrick Gold and Acacia Mining should take huge steps, without financial limitations, to stand up tall in a brave way suited to the image of the world’s largest gold mining company, and answer for the recent human rights violations at their North Mara mine.

We wonder if Acacia are taking steps to clean up their house by ridding themselves of Gary Chapman and Katrina White?

Best regards

Samantha Cole